Low Complexity Time Synchronization Algorithm for OFDM Systems with Repetitive Preambles

In this paper, a new time synchronization algorithm for OFDM systems with repetitive preamble is proposed. This algorithm makes use of coarse and fine time estimation; the fine time estimation is performed using a cross-correlation similar to previous proposals in the literature, whereas the coarse time estimation is made using a new metric and an iterative search of the last sample of the repetitive preamble. A complete analysis of the new metric is included, as well as a wide performance comparison, for multipath channel and carrier frequency offset, with the main time synchronization algorithms found in the literature. Finally, the complexity of the VLSI implementation of this proposal is discussed. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia under grants TEC2006-14204-C02-01 and TEC2008-06787.Canet Subiela, MJ.; Almenar Terre, V.; Flores Asenjo, SJ.; Valls Coquillat, J. (2012). Low Complexity Time Synchronization Algorithm for OFDM Systems with Repetitive Preambles. Journal of Signal Processing Systems. 68(3):287-301. doi:10.1007/s11265-011-0618-6S287301683IEEE 802.11a standard (1999). Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: high-speed physical layer in the 5 GHz band.IEEE 802.11 g standard (2003). Wireless LAN specifications: Further higher data rate extension in the 2.4 GHz band.IEEE 802.16-2004 (2004). Standard for local and metropolitan area networks, part 16: Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems.Lee, D., & Cheun, K. (2002). Coarse symbol synchronization algorithms for OFDM systems in multipath channels. IEEE Communications Letters, 6(10), 446–448.Park, B., Cheon, H., Ko, E., Kang, C., & Hong, D. (2004). A blind OFDM synchronization algorithm based on cyclic correlation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 11(2), 83–85.Beek, J. J., Sandell, M., & Börjesson, P. O. (1997). ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM system. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45(7), 1800–1805.Ma, S., Pan, X., Yang, G., & Ng, T. (2009). Blind symbol synchronization based on cyclic prefix for OFDM systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(4), 1746–1751.Schmidl, T., & Cox, D. (1997). Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 45(12), 1613–1621.Coulson, A. J. (2001). Maximum likelihood synchronization for OFDM using a pilot symbol: Algorithms. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 19(12), 2495–2503.Tufvesson, F., Edfors, O., & Faulker, M. (1999). Time and frequency synchronization for OFDM using PN-sequence preambles. Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), 4, 2203–2207.Shi, K., & Serpedin, E. (2004). Coarse frame and carrier synchronization of OFDM systems: a new metric and comparison. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(4), 1271–1284.Minn, H., Zeng, M., & Bhargava, V. K. (2000). On timing offset estimation for OFDM Systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 4, 242–244.Minn, H., Bhargava, V. K., & Letaief, K. B. (2003). A robust timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2(4), 822–839.Minn, H., Bhargava, V. K., & Letaief, K. B. (2006). A combined timing and frequency synchronization and channel estimation for OFDM. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 54(3), 416–422.Park, B., Cheon, H., Ko, E., Kang, C., & Hong, D. (2003). A novel timing estimation method for OFDM systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 7(5), 239–241.Chang, S., & Kelley, B. (2003). Time synchronization for OFDM-based WLAN systems. Electronics Letters, 39(13), 1024–1026.Wu, Y., Yip, K., Ng, T., & Serpedin, E. (2005). Maximum-likelihood symbol synchronization for IEEE 802.11a WLANs in unknown frequency-selective fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 4(6), 2751–2763.Larsson, E. G., Liu, G., Li, J., & Giannakis, G. B. (2001). Joint symbol timing and channel estimation for OFDM based WLANs. IEEE Communications Letters, 5(8), 325–327.Troya, A., Maharatna, K., Krstic, M., Grass, E., Jagdhold, U., & Kraemer, R. (2007). Efficient inner receiver design for OFDM-based WLAN systems: algorithm and architecture. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(4), 1374–1385.Yang, J., & Cheun, K. (2006). Improved symbol timing synchronization in IEEE 802.11a/g wireless LAN systems in multipath channels. International Conference on Consumer Electronics. doi: 10.1109/ICCE.2006.1598425 .Manusani, S. K., Hshetrimayum, R. S., & Bhattacharjee, R. (2006). Robust time and frequency synchronization in OFDM based 802.11a WLAN systems. Annual India Conference. doi: 10.1109/INDCON.2006.302775 .Zhou, L., & Saito, M. (2004). A new symbol timing synchronization for OFDM based WLANs under multipath fading channels. 15th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. doi: 10.1109/PIMRC.2004.1373890 .Kim, T., & Park, S.-C. (2007). A new symbol timing and frequency synchronization design for OFDM-based WLAN systems. 9th Conference on Advanced Communication Technology. doi: 10.1109/ICACT.2007.358691 .Baek, J. H., Kim, S. D., & Sunwoo, M. H. (2008). SPOCS: Application specific signal processor for OFDM communication systems. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 53(3), 383–397.Van Kempen, G., & van Vliet, L. (2000). Mean and variance of ratio estimators used in fluorescence ratio imaging. Cytometry, 39(4), 300–305.J. Melbo, J., & Schramm, P. (1998). Channel models for HIPERLAN/2 in different indoor scenarios. 3ERI085B, HIPERLAN/2 ETSI/BRAN contribution.Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1972). Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover.López-Martínez, F. J., del Castillo-Sánchez, E., Entrambasaguas, J. T., & Martos-Naya, E. (2010). Iterative-gradient based complex divider FPGA core with dynamic configurability of accuracy and throughput. Journal of Signal Processing Systems. doi: 10.1007/s11265-010-0464-y .Angarita, F., Canet, M. J., Sansaloni, T., Perez-Pascual, A., & Valls, J. (2008). Efficient mapping of CORDIC Algorithm for OFDM-based WLAN. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 52(2), 181–191

Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: An international, multicenter, comparative cohort study

PURPOSE As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19–free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19–free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19–free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19–free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score–matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19–free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks

Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19-Free Surgical Pathways During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Comparative Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19-free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19-free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS: Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19-free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19-free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19-free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score-matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19-free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19-free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks

Transmit Diversity Scheme for OFDM Systems Using the Odd DFT

[EN] A new transmission scheme for OFDM systems that uses the odd discrete Fourier transform to provide frequency diversity gain is proposed. Odd DFT allows the transmission of data subcarriers in frequencies that are centred between those employed by the traditional DFT. This fact is exploited to transmit data subcarriers on the group of frequencies that gives better performance using either traditional DFT or odd DFT. As an example, by using this approach a diversity gain up to 5.3 dB at a BER of 10-4 in a typical indoor channel model can be achieved. © 2011 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion under grant TEC2008-06787.Almenar Terré, V.; Girona, A.; Flores Asenjo, SJ.; Marín-Roig Ramón, J. (2011). Transmit Diversity Scheme for OFDM Systems Using the Odd DFT. IEICE Transactions on Communications. E94-B(8):2411-2413. https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.E94.B.2411S24112413E94-B

Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection

Not availabl

Preoperative nasopharyngeal swab testing and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Surgical services are preparing to scale up in areas affected by COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative SARS-CoV-2 testing and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective cancer surgery. METHODS: This international cohort study included adult patients undergoing elective surgery for cancer in areas affected by SARS-CoV-2 up to 19 April 2020. Patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection before operation were excluded. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pulmonary complications at 30 days after surgery. Preoperative testing strategies were adjusted for confounding using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Of 8784 patients (432 hospitals, 53 countries), 2303 patients (26.2 per cent) underwent preoperative testing: 1458 (16.6 per cent) had a swab test, 521 (5.9 per cent) CT only, and 324 (3.7 per cent) swab and CT. Pulmonary complications occurred in 3.9 per cent, whereas SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 2.6 per cent. After risk adjustment, having at least one negative preoperative nasopharyngeal swab test (adjusted odds ratio 0.68, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.68 to 0.98; P = 0.040) was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications. Swab testing was beneficial before major surgery and in areas with a high 14-day SARS-CoV-2 case notification rate, but not before minor surgery or in low-risk areas. To prevent one pulmonary complication, the number needed to swab test before major or minor surgery was 18 and 48 respectively in high-risk areas, and 73 and 387 in low-risk areas. CONCLUSION: Preoperative nasopharyngeal swab testing was beneficial before major surgery and in high SARS-CoV-2 risk areas. There was no proven benefit of swab testing before minor surgery in low-risk areas

Global attitudes in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic: ACIE Appy Study

Background: Surgical strategies are being adapted to face the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations on the management of acute appendicitis have been based on expert opinion, but very little evidence is available. This study addressed that dearth with a snapshot of worldwide approaches to appendicitis. Methods: The Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe designed an online survey to assess the current attitude of surgeons globally regarding the management of patients with acute appendicitis during the pandemic. Questions were divided into baseline information, hospital organization and screening, personal protective equipment, management and surgical approach, and patient presentation before versus during the pandemic. Results: Of 744 answers, 709 (from 66 countries) were complete and were included in the analysis. Most hospitals were treating both patients with and those without COVID. There was variation in screening indications and modality used, with chest X-ray plus molecular testing (PCR) being the commonest (19\ub78 per cent). Conservative management of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis was used by 6\ub76 and 2\ub74 per cent respectively before, but 23\ub77 and 5\ub73 per cent, during the pandemic (both P < 0\ub7001). One-third changed their approach from laparoscopic to open surgery owing to the popular (but evidence-lacking) advice from expert groups during the initial phase of the pandemic. No agreement on how to filter surgical smoke plume during laparoscopy was identified. There was an overall reduction in the number of patients admitted with appendicitis and one-third felt that patients who did present had more severe appendicitis than they usually observe. Conclusion: Conservative management of mild appendicitis has been possible during the pandemic. The fact that some surgeons switched to open appendicectomy may reflect the poor guidelines that emanated in the early phase of SARS-CoV-2